Post by Mark Sims
The next thing I want to try is a receiver self-survey vs the post processed results...
I fell into that trap many years ago as well :-)
The post processed result eliminates and compensates for a lot of
effects which are invisible to the receiver, that is the entire
point of post processing.
But if your goal is to get good 1PPS out of your receiver, forcing
it to hold a "perfect" position, means asking it to deal with effects
it cannot measure, and as a result you get *worse* 1PPS performance
than if you use the "wrong" self-survey position.
That said, there are certainly a lot of issues with how the self-survey
position should be calculated *and* maintained, because it really needs
to change over time for optimal performance.
Almost any suboptimal antenna-position means that you should vary
the position-hold coordinates over the orbital period (but see
below), but over longer periods also environmental factors come
For instance if you put the antenna on a wood-construction, be it a
pole or a house, it coordinates will vary at the cm level over the
seasons as the wood expands and contracts.
The good news is that the receiver gives you the input data to work
and model these biases, the bad news you don't get a lot of data.
I did some experiments when ten Oncore M12+T's passed through my lab
many years ago: I plotted the reported "residuals" vs. satellite
position, and I tried to update the held position on a daily basis
using the trend, and the results were measurable at the several ns
I didn't persue this further, because my latitude is particular
unfavourable to the simple (N/S+E/W) approach (no birds north of
me) and with only a single receiver the amount of input data is too
low for such a crude algorithm.
A more complex geometrical model could probably get more mileage
out of the sparse data, as would tracking more birds than the
12 the M12 could track.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
***@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.