Discussion:
time-nuts Digest, Vol 165, Issue 48
(too old to reply)
AC0XU (Jim)
2018-04-25 11:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Gary-

Interesting. The TICC is spec'ed to have a 10e-10 AD floor at 1 sec. Your measurement is slightly better than the spec. How can we know whether you are measuring the test source (JL GPSTLXO) or the stability of the TICC itself?

Jim
Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..."
1. Re: Cheap jitter measurements (Gary E. Miller)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 20:45:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cheap jitter measurements
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Time-nuts!
I went ahead and bought the TAPR-TICC, it is a very impressive
instrument. For this setup it is combined with a Jackson Labs
GPSTLXO as the 10MHz reference. The JL is a GPS disciplined temperature
compensated crystal oscillator.
The first setup uses the TAPR-TICC in Period mode, outputting the PPS
period individually for channel A and channel B.
Channel A is the PPS of a plain u-blox NEO-M8N. Channel B is the
PPS of the JL GPSTLXO.
Simple to get the cycle times from the USB serial port.
Then I grabbed a copy of the easy to use Python Allantools.
https://github.com/aewallin/allantools
A little coding later and there are nice plots. They were compared to
the output of tvb's adev.c program. Results are similar.
Results are attached. gps.png is the plain NEO-M8N. GPSTLXO is the
JL part.
gps.png looks as expected. GPSTLXO.png shows the quality of the JL part,
but does have some odd divots in the plot. Maybe artifacts of using the
PPS derived from the reference 10MHz? Or an artifact of the 10e6 divider?
There are adev's of Rb standards here: http://www.ke5fx.com/rb.htm
My guess is that the oadev at 1s would be about 50x better with
a Rubidium? But similar at 10k seconds?
Comments?
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gps.png
Type: image/png
Size: 46884 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <Loading Image...>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GPSTLXO.png
Type: image/png
Size: 35622 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <Loading Image...>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
------------------------------
End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 165, Issue 48
******************************************
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-***@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Loading...